Marcinczyk v. STATE POLICE TRAINING COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that ambiguity in exculpatory contracts “must be resolved against the drafter of the agreement” (quoting Gershon v. Regency Dining Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J.Super. 237, 845 A.2d 720, 726 (2004))
• “[P]arties bargaining at arms-length may generally contract as they wish, subject only to traditional defenses such as fraud, duress, illegality or mistake.” (citations omitted)
• in absence of fraud, duress, illegality, or mistake, party to contract is “ ‘conclusively presumed’ to understand and assent to its legal effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).