Marchman v. NCNB Texas National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the shareholder in that case could not claim a separate and distinct injury because the shareholder held 100% of the stock
• holding that the shareholder in that case could not claim a separate and distinct injury because the shareholder held 100% of the stock
• holding that a shareholder/guarantor did not suffer direct injury for standing purposes where the guarantees entered into by the shareholder were never enforced
• holding that the corporation, not its shareholders, owned the rights asserted in the lawsuit
• stating that a dismissal for forum non conveniens did not qualify as a decision on the merits
• recognizing presumption under Rule 1-054(E) that prevailing party is entitled to award of costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).