Marchman v. Grange Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting policyholder’s argument that policy value statute superseded repair or replacement requirement stated in replacement cost rider
• replacement cost rider did not increase the face value of the policy; insured not entitled to $125,000 plus $70,000
• “When a plaintiff’s right to recover on a contract depends upon a condition precedent to be performed by him, he must allege and prove the performance of such condition precedent, or allege a sufficient legal excuse for its nonperformance.”
• discerning no ambiguity in similar policy language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).