Marchant v. U.S. Collections West, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Arizona law to hold that debt collector's application for writ of garnishment was unauthorized practice of law
• involving a non-lawyer’s unlawful completion of an application for a writ of garnishment
• Rule 31 trumps statutory law because the practice of law is “within the exclusive authority of the judiciary” (citation omitted)
• Rule 31 trumps statutory law because the practice of law is \within the exclusive authority of the judiciary\ (citation omitted)
• “Courts have denied a claim of fraudulent joinder when 13 there is any possibility that a plaintiff may prevail on the cause of action against the in-state 14 defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).