Marcelus v. CCA OF TENNESSEE, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “One instance of disparate treatment hardly constitutes a pattern that would justify an inference of intentional discrimination[.]”
• “From the standpoint of the putative discriminator, it hardly makes sense to hire workers from a group one dislikes ..., only to fire them once they are on the job.” (quoting Proud v. Stone, 945 F.2d 796, 797 (4th Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).