Marcelle Jean Pierre v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation. Appeal of Marcelle Jean Pierre. Appeal of Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to be in compliance with Rule 52(a), findings of fact and conclusions of law do not need to be stated separately in a court's memorandum opinion
• holding that to be in compliance with Rule 52(a), findings of fact and conclusions of law do not need to be stated separately in a court's memorandum opinion
• holding that to be in compliance with Rule 52(a), findings of fact and conclusions of law do not need to be stated separately in a court's memorandum opinion
• holding that to be in compliance with Rule 52(a), findings of fact and conclusions of law do not need to be stated separately in a court's memorandum opinion
• “It was not required under Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the findings and conclusions be stated separately.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).