Marc P. Turgeon v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “Congress clearly intended the General Counsel of the Federal Labor Relations Authority to have unreviewable discretion to decline to issue unfair labor complaints”
• containing an extensive discussion of the legislative history of the applicable statutes
• refusal of General Counsel of FLRA to issue a complaint was not a final order and, therefore, not judicially reviewable
• \[I]t is appropriate ... to consider precedent developed under the NLRA in interpreting the [FSLMRS].\
• “[I]t is appropriate . . . to consider precedent developed under the NLRA in interpreting the [FSLMRS].”
• “[I]t is appropriate . . . to consider precedent developed under the NLRA in interpreting the [FSLMRS].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).