Skip to main content
· 3/5/2003

Marc Feldman v. Allstate Insurance Company Vicki Weed

Citations

  • 322 F.3d 660
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1981
  • 60 Fed. R. Serv. 899
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3892
  • 2003 WL 730755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a bad faith claim should be dismissed on 3 summary judgment if the defendant demonstrates that there was a genuine dispute as to 4 coverage
  • stating that summary judgment should be granted for defendant on an insurance bad faith claim under California law if the defendant demonstrates a genuine dispute as to coverage
  • “Most evidentiary 22 rules are procedural in nature, and the Federal Rules of Evidence ordinarily govern.”
  • motion to reconsider extended time to appeal despite failure to comply with district court’s local rule requiring a statement that parties conferred before motion was filed
  • “state evidence rules that are ‘intimately bound up’ with the state’s substantive decision making must be given full effect by federal courts sitting in 23 diversity”
  • “under the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of California law, a 11 genuine dispute may concern either a reasonable factual dispute or an unsettled 12 area of insurance law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferguson, Hall, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.