Marc Andrew Mario v. P & C Food Markets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even though a party filed objections to the magistrate judge’s R&R, they were not specific enough to preserve the claim for review
• finding that a party's objections to the magistrate judge’s R&R were not specific enough to preserve the claim for review
• “Merely referring the court to previously filed papers or arguments does not constitute an adequate objection.”
• “Merely referring the court to previously filed papers or arguments does not constitute an adequate objection”
• “Merely referring the court to previously filed papers or arguments does not constitute an adequate objection under [] Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) . . . .”
• “Where parties receive clear notice of the consequences, failure timely to object to a magistrate’s report and recommendation operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate’s decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).