Marbury v. Pace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere fact an issue is “one of first impression” does not require or justify interlocutory review
• finding that the plaintiff’s mediation demand did not constitute equitable tolling where the plaintiff waited to file suit until after mediation attempts proved unsuccessful
• explaining that an issue of “first impression in this Circuit . . . 5 does not require, or [on its own] justify, certification of an interlocutory appeal”
• “Once calendared, trial on Defendant’s counterclaim can be accomplished in less than a week.”
• “[W]hile the issue . . . is one 8 of first impression in this Circuit, that fact alone does not ‘require, or in this instance, justify, certification of an interlocutory appeal.’” (quoting Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Nat’l Energy Pol’y Dev. Grp., 233 F. Supp. 2d at 20)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).