Marbulk Shipping, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Materials, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “pre-engagement documents” were not privileged where there was no evidence of an intention to retain the attorney “in a legal capacity at the time the communications were made”
• \Forfeiture of privilege is not conditioned on whether the privileged documents ultimately will prove [defendant's] defense.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).