Skip to main content
· 1/11/1901

Marble Savings Bank v. Williams

Citations

  • 23 Wash. 766
  • 63 P. 511
  • 1901 Wash. LEXIS 481

Syllabus

<p>EES JUDICATA — ADMISSIBILITY OE EVIDENCE TO SHOW WHAT CONCLUDED BY EORMEB JUDGMENT.</p> <p>Where a judgment in a former action is pleaded as an estoppel in a subsequent action between the same parties involving the same subject matter, and the record does not disclose upon which of several issues the case was litigated and decided, extrinsic evidence is admissible for the purpose of establishing that the former action was determined upon an issue which is not involved in the subsequent action.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.