Maranon v. Maranon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that an inquiry into the “duration” and “scope” of questioning not necessary when there was probable cause to arrest passenger for seatbelt violation before questioning started
• holding officer’s question about marijuana possession to passenger who had been arrested for marijuana possession three days prior was not unreasonable seizure
• upholding the lawfulness of a search, the consent for which was obtained by asking a motorist three questions unrelated to the purpose of the traffic stop
• noting an officer may ask questions unrelated to the traffic stop without having reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
• upholding the lawfulness of a search, the consent for which was obtained by asking a motorist three questions unrelated to the purpose of the traffic stop
• discussing Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 117 S. Ct. 417 (1996)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).