Skip to main content
· 1/22/2002

Mara M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Citations

  • 38 P.3d 41
  • 201 Ariz. 503
  • 365 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 35
  • 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that although “service of process on counsel . . . may not in fact apprise a parent . . . of the pendency of termination proceedings, . . . it is a means reasonably calculated under the circumstances to notify the parent and to protect her rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Berch, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.