Maplewood Bank v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under U.C.C. section 9-313, a fixture financer with priority interest in kitchen fixtures, having foregone right of removal, could not claim priority over mortgage lender in proceeds of sale of real estate
• declining to construe U.C.C. section 9-318 as permitting fixture financer's interest to continue in proceeds because this \would be legislating\ and noting that, in the one state (Louisiana
• secured party with priority based on perfected fixture filing gained priority only as to goods or chattels which became fixtures, not as to remainder of real property; no right to proceeds of foreclosure sale
• secured party with priority based on perfected fixture filing gained priority only as to goods or chattels which became fixtures, not as to remainder of real property; no right to proceeds of foreclosure sale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).