Maples v. West Virginia Department of Commerce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] litigant may not silently acquiesce to an alleged error . . . and then raise that error as a reason for reversal on appeal”
• discussing effect of waiver of right to review on plain error doctrine
• discussing effect of waiver of right to review on plain error doctrine
• “A litigant may not silently acquiesce to an alleged error, or actively contribute to such error, and then raise that error as a reason for reversal on appeal”.
• “A litigant may not silently acquiesce to an alleged error, or actively contribute to such error[.]”
• “A litigant may not silently acquiesce to an alleged error, or actively contribute to such error, and then raise that error as a reason for reversal on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).