Maples v. Maples

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The trial court had authority to enter a divorce decree nunc pro tunc as of the prior date where the jury had previously returned a verdict and the cause was ripe for judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• TAYLOR, EXR. v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION, INC. (And Vice Versa)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-03-15· cited 16×
• In re Interest of I.L.M.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-29· cited 15×
• In THE INTEREST OF I. L. M., Children
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-29· cited 11×
• Sigal v. Sigal
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-10-03· cited 4×
• Eversole v. Eversole
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-02-27· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Norman v. Ault
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-06-07· cited 43×
• Coleman v. Coleman
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-12-05· cited 40×
• Moore v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1972-10-06· cited 18×
• Hinkle v. Woolever
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-04-16· cited 16×
• Kendall v. Peach State MacHinery, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-11-30· cited 13×
• Richardson v. Barber
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-12-03· cited 9×
• Beard v. Beard
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-06-15· cited 1×