Skip to main content
· 1/14/2009

Maples v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 594 F. Supp. 2d 937
  • 14 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1262
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3156
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,445
  • 2009 WL 112817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[i]t is well-established in labor law that a particular custom or practice can become an implied term of a labor agreement through a period of acquiescence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruben Castillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.