Skip to main content
· 4/20/1953

Maples v. Howell

Citations

  • 217 Miss. 322
  • 28 Adv. S. 26
  • 64 So. 2d 364
  • 1953 Miss. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that presence of necessary parties is jurisdictional and cannot be waived
  • finding that presence of necessary parties is jurisdictional and cannot be waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ethridge, Holmes, Kyle, Lotterhos, Robekds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.