Skip to main content
· 12/7/1981

Maple Properties v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Citations

  • 454 U.S. 1099
  • 102 S. Ct. 673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Rule 1.7 and not Young to antitrust class action civil suit involving potential conflicts created by class counsel’s representation of government and private interests
  • allowing intervention when, “[a]although the case has been pending for more than two years, discovery on the merits has not been completed and dispositive motions have not been filed. As a consequence, there is no indication that this litigation is close to conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.