· 3/30/2001
Manzon v. Stant Corp.
Citations
- 138 F. Supp. 2d 1110
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9755
- 2001 WL 314924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that claimant had a “high” burden in proving crime’s elements because CVCA is punitive
- cited with approval by Highhouse for the proposition that a bonus based on a financial target and achieving “individual personal objectives” was not a wage
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.