Skip to main content
· 4/18/1938

Manzo v. Dullea

Citations

  • 96 F.2d 135
  • 116 A.L.R. 1241
  • 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that significant state involvement satisfies public participation requirement because “it serves the identical purpose that the public notice provision seeks to effectuate”
  • concluding public participation requirement is satisfied if “a state environmental agency is substantially involved in the formulation and execution of a preliminary remediation plan.”
  • concluding public participation requirement satisfied by state agency’s approval of two site work plans and supervision of site assessment and interim remedial measures implementation by on-site investigations
  • holding CERCLA's contribution scheme preempted state law remedies of restitution and indemnification
  • declining to carve out a judicially created defense under CERCLA that Congress itself chose not to create
  • declining to carve out a judicially created defense under CERCLA that Congress itself chose not to create

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chase, Hand, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.