· 4/18/1938
Manzo v. Dullea
Citations
- 96 F.2d 135
- 116 A.L.R. 1241
- 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that significant state involvement satisfies public participation requirement because “it serves the identical purpose that the public notice provision seeks to effectuate”
- concluding public participation requirement is satisfied if “a state environmental agency is substantially involved in the formulation and execution of a preliminary remediation plan.”
- concluding public participation requirement satisfied by state agency’s approval of two site work plans and supervision of site assessment and interim remedial measures implementation by on-site investigations
- holding CERCLA's contribution scheme preempted state law remedies of restitution and indemnification
- declining to carve out a judicially created defense under CERCLA that Congress itself chose not to create
- declining to carve out a judicially created defense under CERCLA that Congress itself chose not to create
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chase, Hand, Swan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.