Skip to main content
· 3/4/1985

Manzanares v. Lerner's, Inc.

Citations

  • 696 P.2d 479
  • 102 N.M. 391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorneys must bear the costs of proceedings for their benefit, but that they may receive fees for proceedings that increase the amount of fees
  • holding that attorneys must bear the costs of proceedings for their benefit, but that they may receive fees for proceedings that increase the amount of fees
  • holding that attorneys must bear the costs of proceedings for their benefit, but that they may receive feqs for proceedings that increase the amount of fees
  • where appellate review in worker's compensation case was brought solely for the benefit of attorney, free process allowed by statute did not apply, and each party would pay their own costs
  • award held inadequate where time and effort not considered even though issues simple
  • where appellate review in worker’s compensation case was brought solely for the benefit of attorney, free process allowed by statute did not apply, and each party would pay their own costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Federici, Sosa, Riordan, Stowers, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.