Tenth Circuit· 8/10/2009
Manzanares v. Higdon
Citations
- 575 F.3d 1135
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17817
- 2009 WL 2430643
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that both probable cause and either a warrant or exigent circumstances are required “to seize an individual in his home”
- concluding officer was compelled to leave after consent was withdrawn by the person who initially granted it
- indicating that detention of 90 minutes or longer constitutes arrest, rather than investigative detention
- collecting precedent clearly establishing the right to limit, qualify, or withdraw consent to a warrantless entry
- rejecting the idea “that the existence of a grey area between arrests and investigative detentions means that no reasonable officer can ever understand that he has arrested a suspect”
- “[B]ased both on the duration of the detention and the use of forceful measures, we hold that Manzanares was arrested....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, Ebel, Lucero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesTenth Circuit· 2016-07-25· cited 258×
- Quinn v. YoungTenth Circuit· 2015-03-13· cited 210×
- Phillips v. Community Ins. Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2012-04-27· cited 185×
- Henry v. StoreyTenth Circuit· 2011-10-03· cited 160×
- Morales v. ChadbourneFirst Circuit· 2015-07-17· cited 51×
- El-Ghazzawy v. BerthiaumeEighth Circuit· 2011-03-15· cited 50×
- Ysasi v. BrownD. New Mexico· 2014-02-28· cited 45×
- James v. ChavezD. New Mexico· 2011-11-09· cited 36×
- Kerns v. Board of CommissionersD. New Mexico· 2012-08-22· cited 33×
- Shimomura v. CarlsonTenth Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 22×
- Wilson v. JaraD. New Mexico· 2011-10-17· cited 16×
- McGarry v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners for the Cnty. of LincolnD. New Mexico· 2018-02-28· cited 15×
- Manzanares v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2010-12-16· cited 14×
- United States v. WilliamsTenth Circuit· 2022-09-08· cited 14×
- Dejuan Haynes v. Brian MinnehanEighth Circuit· 2021-09-21· cited 11×
- Dorato v. SmithD. New Mexico· 2015-05-26· cited 11×
- United States v. ChristyD. New Mexico· 2011-05-18· cited 9×
- United States v. $107,840.00 in U.S. CurrencyS.D. Iowa· 2011-04-29· cited 8×
- United States v. MartinezD. New Mexico· 2009-11-16· cited 7×
- El-Ghazzawy v. BerthiaumeD. Minnesota· 2010-04-16· cited 6×
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 3,271×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 2,036×
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 1,303×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court· 2006-03-22· cited 1,203×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 919×
- Fogarty v. GallegosTenth Circuit· 2008-04-18· cited 788×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.