Manz v. Bohara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “one claiming property to the exclusion of the true owner through the doctrine of acquiescence” must prove it by clear and convincing evidence just as a claim of adverse possession must be proved
• holding trail between three rock piles too uncertain as boundary because one rock pile had been removed, other piles were continually widening, and trail regularly “move[d] from one location to another within those widths”
• line must be “definite, certain, and not speculative, and open to observation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).