· 7/11/1983
Manway Construction Company, Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of Hartford, Hartford National Bank & Trust Co., Garnishee-Appellant
Citations
- 711 F.2d 501
- 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 266
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25889
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that if a court does not have subject matter jurisdiction, dismissal is mandatory.”
- garnishee bank's conduct in not \rolling over\ certificate of deposit raises questions unrelated to the court's judgment requiring separate basis for federal court jurisdiction
- garnishee bank’s conduct in not “rolling over” certificate of deposit raises questions unrelated to the court’s judgment requiring separate basis for federal court jurisdiction
- ‘Tt is common ground that in our federal system of limited jurisdiction any party or the court sua sponte, at any stage of the proceedings, may raise the question of whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction; and, if it does not, dismissal is mandatory.”
- “It is common ground that in our federal system of limited jurisdiction any party or the court sua sponte, at any stage of the proceedings, may raise the question of whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction; and, if it does not, dismissal is mandatory.”
- “It is common ground that in our federal system of limited jurisdiction any party or the court sua sponte, at any stage of the proceedings, may raise the question of whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction; and, if it does not, dismissal is mandatory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaufman, Timbers, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.