Skip to main content
· 4/12/1962

Manville Boiler Co. v. Columbia Boiler Co. of Pottstown, Inc.

Citations

  • 204 F. Supp. 392
  • 134 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 130
  • 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The phrase ‘subject to’ ordinarily operates to limit a power or right, not expand it.”
  • “The phrase ‘subject to’ ordinarily operates to limit a power or right, not expand it.”
  • “Rule 32 explicitly provides for the use of depositions when a witness is unavailable . . . because that witness lives more than [one hundred] miles from the place of the hearing . . . .”
  • “The better reading of subdivisions (b) (2) and (c)(3)(A)(ii) of Rule 45 is that the territorial scope of a court’s subpoena power is defined by subdivision (b)(2), subject to the limitations spelled out in subdivision (c) (3)(A)(ii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dusen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.