Manuri v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that order of dismissal without prejudice was appealable where counsel informed court of appeals at oral argument that statute of limitations had run
• explaining that district courts possess “broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process”
• explaining that district courts possess “broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process”
• “[D]istrict courts possess broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process.”
• “[D]istrict courts possess broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiff's complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process.”
• “[D]istrict courts possess broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).