Manufacturers Hanover Mortgage Corp. v. Snell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that HUD's servicing requirement regulations may be a defense to foreclosure if they are made terms of a mortgage contract
• “alleged irregularities ... and other reasons ... for setting aside the foreclosure” give plaintiffs standing to challenge the foreclosure and/or sheriffs sale
• “The Supreme Court has long held that the mortgagor may hold over after foreclosure by advertisement and test the validity of the sale in the summary proceeding.”
• “The [Michigan] Supreme Court has long held that the mortgagor may hold over after foreclosure by advertisement and test the validity of the sale in the summary proceeding.”
• “[F]oreclosure by advertisement, as was employed by the plaintiff in the case at bar, is not a judicial proceeding of any sort . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).