Manufacturers' Furnishing Co. v. Kremer

Citations

• 7 S.D. 463
• 64 N.W. 528
• 1895 S.D. LEXIS 101

Syllabus

<p>The admission of parol testimony to show that a written order for school apparatus, apparently complete in form, was signed by members of a school board and taken into the possession of soliciting agents, upon express conditions that have never been complied with, in order to constitute a delivery, or give such order any binding effect, is not a violation of the rule that extrinsic parol testimony ’is'inadmissible for the purpose of adding to, substracting from, contradicting, or in any manner varying the terms of a written instrument.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.</p>