· 6/10/2010
Manuele v. City of Springfield, Ill.
Citations
- 718 F. Supp. 2d 939
- 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 375
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57597
- 2010 WL 2348608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In most instances, determining whether a meal period was spent predominately for the employer’s benefit entails resolving factual disputes.”
- “Defendant’s bare-bones, undeveloped argument does not sustain Defendant’s initial burden of demonstrating that there is no genuine issue of material fact for trial with respect to the statute of limitations.”
- “Defendant’s bare-bones, undeveloped argument does not sustain Defendant’s initial burden of demonstrating that there is no genuine issue of material fact for trial with respect to the statute of limitations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jeanne E. Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.