Skip to main content
· 6/10/2010

Manuele v. City of Springfield, Ill.

Citations

  • 718 F. Supp. 2d 939
  • 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 375
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57597
  • 2010 WL 2348608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In most instances, determining whether a meal period was spent predominately for the employer’s benefit entails resolving factual disputes.”
  • “Defendant’s bare-bones, undeveloped argument does not sustain Defendant’s initial burden of demonstrating that there is no genuine issue of material fact for trial with respect to the statute of limitations.”
  • “Defendant’s bare-bones, undeveloped argument does not sustain Defendant’s initial burden of demonstrating that there is no genuine issue of material fact for trial with respect to the statute of limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jeanne E. Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.