Manuel Vilchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether the agency failed to consider relevant evidence is reviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D)
• explaining that a due process violation requires a showing that “the outcome of the proceeding may have been affected by the alleged violation”
• stating that, to show a due process violation, the alien must demonstrate “prejudice, which means that the outcome of the proceeding may have been affected by the alleged violation” (citation omitted)
• concluding the agency gave adequate consideration to all of the positive and negative equities in the record and noting that the IJ does not have to 3 write an exegesis on every contention
• observing petitioner had not demonstrated prejudice when he did not explain how the IJ’s decision would be affected
• exercising jurisdiction over due process issue, but holding no jurisdiction to review discretionary decision to deny cancellation of removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).