Manuel v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining “The PFA order . . . was a final order, from which no motion to reconsider or appeal was filed. The trial court, therefore, had no jurisdiction to set aside that order seven months later.”
• stating, “PFAA proceedings are initiated in [an] effort to stop [the] perpetration of abuse and are civil in nature, while the indirect criminal contempt actions are criminal in nature and seek punishment for [a] violation of a protective order” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).