Skip to main content

Manuel v. Gill

Citations

  • 753 N.W.2d 48
  • 481 Mich. 637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the word “may” is generally an indication of permissive action
  • stating that “[a] court does not construe the meaning of statutory terms in a vacuum . . . [r]ather, we interpret the words in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme”
  • “In general, our courts have said that the term ‘may’ is ‘permissive,’ as opposed to the term ‘shall,’ which is considered ‘mandatory[.]’ ”
  • “It is a familiar principle of statutory construction that words grouped in a list should be given related meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor, Corrigan, Young, Markman, Cavanagh, Weaver, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Manuel v. Gill

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.