Manuel v. Employers' Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that arresting officer’s testimony was sufficient to support conviction for driving under the influence of drugs where the defendant refused blood test but admitted to ingesting three different drugs
• applying Griffith in a case addressing the sufficiency of the evidence for a DUI conviction under subsection (d)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).