Manuel Trejo v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an intervening change in the law can create an “exceptional circumstance” that overcomes 7 United States v. Elespuru, 14-0012/AF waiver
• noting that Crawford “did not alter an expert witness’s ability to rely on (without repeating to the jury) otherwise inadmissible evidence in formulating his opinion”
• “We do not reach the merits of defendant’s arguments on this issue because of the defendant’s failure to pursue it in its prior appeal.”
• while “the Supreme Court in Crawford altered Confrontation Clause precedent, it said nothing about the Clause’s relation to Federal Rule of Evidence 703” and “did not alter an expert witness’s ability to rely on (without repeating to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).