Manuel Pina Babbitt v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying the second or successive application for failure to meet the due diligence prong and noting that the actual innocence prong need not be addressed
• holding § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii) encompasses death-sentence challenges
• ineffective assistance claim based on counsel's 6 alcohol abuse successive of claim that counsel failed to present Post Traumatic Stress Disorder 7 claim
• “[W]e will not consider new factual grounds in support of the same legal claim that was previously presented.”
• black petitioner failed to exercise due diligence where his counsel's failure to question an all-white jury about their potential race bias put him on notice that his counsel might , himself , harbor racial animus
• black petitioner failed to exercise due diligence where his counsel’s failure to question an all-white jury about their potential race bias put him on notice that his counsel might, himself, harbor racial animus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).