Skip to main content
· 7/17/1987

Manuel Nick Solsona, Jr. v. Warden, F.C.I.

Citations

  • 821 F.2d 1129
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that only the sentencing court has jurisdiction to hear a § 2255 motion attacking a sentence
  • explaining that, because the 2 Find an Inmate, Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ (search Reg. No. 43109-308) (last visited Oct. 26, 2020
  • finding that federal courts may construe and re-characterize a pro se prisoner action “according to the essence of the prisoner’s claims, regardless of the label that the prisoner places on his complaint”
  • finding that federal courts may construe and re-characterize a pro se prisoner action “according to the essence of the prisoner’s claims, regardless of the label that the prisoner places on his complaint”
  • finding that federal courts may construe and re-characterize a pro se prisoner action “according to the essence of the prisoner’s claims, regardless of the label that the prisoner places on his complaint”
  • finding that federal courts may construe and re-characterize a pro se prisoner action “according to the essence of the prisoner’s claims, regardless of the label that the prisoner places on his complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin, Randall, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.