Skip to main content
· 11/23/1982

Manuel Joaquim MacEdo Etc. v. The Boeing Company, Keith L. Boskoff, Etc. v. Transportes Aereos Portugueses, Etc.

Citations

  • 693 F.2d 683
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “Portugese law would surely be applicable to many” issues in an air crash case “involving a Portuguese airline, an airport in Portugal, [and] predominantly Portuguese plaintiffs”
  • reversing a forum non conveniens dismissal based in part on the district court’s failure to consider the financial hardship to the plaintiffs of litigating in Portugal
  • determining location of damage evidence and then considering where liability evidence most accessible
  • reversing a forum non conveniens dismissal based in part on the district court’s failure to consider the financial hardship to the plaintiffs of litigating in Portugal
  • “It seems to us that as to the Boskoff [American] plaintiffs, at least, the plaintiffs’ choice is entitled to considerable deference....”
  • “In particular, dismissal without justifying the financial burden imposed on the American plaintiffs in an action for alleged wrongdoing of American manufacturers is ... an abuse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swygert, Fairchild, Bartels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.