Skip to main content
· 11/17/1986

Manuel Herrera and Lupe Herrera, Cross-Appellants v. First Northern Savings and Loan Association, Cross

Citations

  • 805 F.2d 896
  • 6 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 878
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that some courts have included gross receipts tax of attorney’s fee awards with no discussion
  • noting that some courts have included the gross receipts tax as part of attorney’s fee awards with no discussion
  • noting that some courts have included the gross receipts tax as part of attorney’s fee awards with no discussion
  • finding CLA violation for failure to disclose is \presumed to injure the borrower by frustrating the purpose of permitting consumers to compare various available credit terms.\
  • when “over 30 other terms and phrases appearing on the disclosure statement are also printed in capital letters, in the identical size, style and boldness of type” as the APR, the disclosure does not comply with the TILA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holloway, McKay, Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.