Manuel Espinoza v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reports used or expected to be used for commercial purposes do not qualify under the FCRA
• stating that “reports collected for business, commercial, and professional purposes do not fall under the FCRA” (internal quotations and citations omitted)
• “In enacting the FCRA, Congress sought to regulate the dissemination of information used for consumer purposes, not business purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).