Manuel Davila v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we look to the substance of the court’s dismissal, rather than the label it employs, in applying res judicata
• stating that res judicata “bar pertains not only to claims that were raised in the prior action, but also to claims that could have been raised previously.” (citation omitted)
• stating that “legal conclusions masquerading as facts” will not prevent dismissal
• stating that “legal conclusions masquerading as facts” will not prevent dismissal
• stating that “legal conclusions masquerading as facts” will not prevent dismissal
• stating that “legal conclusions masquerading as facts” will not prevent dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).