Manson v. Inge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a municipality may require a hauler with which it contracts to deliver waste to a particular disposal site
• noting that “Smith-town is spending tax dollars to pay for both [waste collection and disposal] services”
• noting that \federal courts have for more than 150 years invoked the Commerce Clause to scrutinize state regulations affecting interstate commerce\
• noting that <br>\Smithtown is spending tax dollars to pay for both [waste <br>collection and disposal] services\
• noting that \Smithtown is spending tax dollars to pay for both [waste collection and disposal] services\
• holding that, although the county was 3 Indeed, such a statute was struck down by the district court in Gulch Gaming. 11 a market participant in the waste disposal business, the county could not compel private parties to buy services from the local incinerator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).