· 3/11/1997
Mansmann v. Tuman
Citations
- 970 F. Supp. 389
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Third Circuit’s interpretation of Pennsylvania law is binding on the district court[.]”
- “A federal court sitting in diversity applies the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, [Rule] 8(a), not Pennsylvania pleading law, governs the standard of specificity applicable to plaintiff’s . . . claim[s].” (citations omitted, alteration in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Padova
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.