Mansfield v. Pollock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interception under § 570-A:2,11(d) may be recorded and used as evidence at trial
• stating that solicitation of another to commit murder does not necessarily constitute attempted murder
• finding overt act element was met where defendant paid hit man $1,000, identified intended victim, and instructed hit man to dispose of corpse outside of state
• finding no violation of the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel when informant elicited statements from the defendant about uncharged attempted murder even though defendant was already charged with witness tampering
• decided on the assumption “arguendo” that article 19 applies to electronic eavesdropping, on analogy with the fourth amendment rationale developed in Katz
• stating test for impermissible variance between indictment and proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).