Indiana Court of Appeals· 5/28/2009
Mansfield v. McSHURLEY
Citations
- 911 N.E.2d 581
- 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 991
- 2009 WL 1491299
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when a candidate could not have known that he might have lost the election until after the election contest deadline had passed, it was permissible to dismiss his 15 election contest where “the availability of quo warranto [gave him] a ‘day in court’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Parvin v. WimbergIndiana Supreme Court· 1892-03-17· cited 95×
- Charter One Mortgage Corp. v. CondraIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-05-02· cited 53×
- Pabey v. PastrickIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-08-06· cited 47×
- Horseman v. KellerIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-01-31· cited 36×
- State Ex Rel. McCormick v. Sup. Ct. of Knox Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1951-01-05· cited 16×
- Gaddis v. McCulloughIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-05-10· cited 9×
- In Re JDIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 9×
- State Ex Rel. Arredondo v. Lake Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 8×
- State Ex Rel. Locks v. PEAK, J., ETC.Indiana Supreme Court· 1958-07-17· cited 6×
- Briles v. WurtsbaughIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-11-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.