Mansfield Coal & Coke Co. v. McEnery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying common law mailbox rule to hold that claimant received notice on date notice was mailed
• Board did not credit claimant’s testimony that correctly addressed decision was delivered to another address
• evidence that notice was mailed to claimant’s last known address and not returned as undeliverable shifts the burden of proof to claimant to prove lack of notice; Board need not accept even unrebutted evidence from claimant
• applying the common law mail box rule to UC proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).