Mansell v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contract between a railroad and its employees negated the at-will nature of the relationship and limited the right of the employer to discharge the employees
• holding that a contract between a railroad and its employees negated the at-will nature of the relationship and limited the right of the employer to discharge the employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ramos v. Henry C. Beck Co.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-05-01· cited 70×
• Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1950-05-01· cited 55×
• United Transportation Union v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-09· cited 35×
• Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1985-04-11· cited 35×
• Mott v. Montgomery County, Tex.
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1994-10-06· cited 25×
• Wilburn v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. of Texas
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1954-05-14· cited 22×
• Dallas County Water Control & Improvement District No. 7 v. Ingram
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1965-10-08· cited 13×
• Matagorda County Hospital District v. Burwell
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-12-19· cited 12×
• Federal Express Corp. v. Dutschmann
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1992-08-31· cited 6×
• Higdon v. Shelton Motor Co.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1941-12-31· cited 4×
• Matagorda County Hospital District v. Burwell, Christine
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-12-19