Manning v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the State failed to prove that the pills at issue contained phenmetrazine, a controlled substance, where the pills were not described by markings, if any, which appeared on the pill, or shape, but instead only by color
• indicating State must present chemical analysis or other evidence to establish the identity of a controlled substance
• “Without more description than is present in the instant record, the introduction of the tablets, or a chemical analysis, we cannot find the officer was able to identify the pills.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shaffer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2006-01-19· cited 57×
• Guia v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-04-17· cited 19×
• Ex Parte Tarver
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1985-08-01· cited 14×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-13· cited 10×
• Kaufman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-12-07· cited 3×
• Brandon Keith Shaffer v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-01-19
• Keith Rochell Woods v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-07-09
• Raul Gallegos, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-02-10
• Oscar Pineda v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-09-10
• Johnathan Wayne Swallow v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2022-07-07
• Timothy Edward Smith v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2024-10-30

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davenport v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-15· cited 94×
• Duran v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-29· cited 37×