Skip to main content

Manning v. State

Citations

  • 292 S.E.2d 95
  • 162 Ga. App. 494
  • 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in-eourt identification was not impermissibly suggestive although defendant was the only black male present in the courtroom at the time of the identification
  • in-court identification not impermissibly tainted by the fact that defendant was the only young black male in the courtroom at the time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sognier, Deen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.